De Beers Defaults in Antitrust Suit

De Beers' ability to advertise diamonds in the United States is in danger after the company defaulted in an antitrust suit brought by an irate consumer. When the company, which has no legal presence in the United States, didn't show up for June hearings on the matter, District Judge Harold Baer Jr. ordered a default judgment in favor of plaintiff Andrew Leider. The suit claimed that De Beers violated the Sherman Antitrust Act, the Lanham Act, and the Wilson Tariff Act by conspiring to keep diamond prices high and falsely claiming that diamonds are rare. The action will now be referred to a magistrate judge who will determine damages. The lawsuit requests that De Beers stop: "Advertising diamonds in the United States"; "Making agreements with United States citizens in unlawful restraint of trade"; "Engaging in acts designed to artificial
JCK PRO

This content is exclusive to JCK Pro subscribers. Subscribe now to access this and much more with discount code GOPRO21 for $199 for an entire year of access (reg. $249).

SUBSCRIBE TO CONTINUE

Already a JCK Pro? Log in

A JCK Pro subscription is your all-access pass to people and resources on the
cutting edge of the retail jewelry industry, from the industry authority you
know and trust

Learn about the Perks of JCK Pro

Log Out

Are you sure you want to log out?

CancelLog out