GIA Study Method Is Flawed, Expert Says The Gemological Institute of America’s recently published study on diamond proportion and brilliance prompted many to question its conclusions, contending that its critique of current diamond-grading systems is premature without a consideration of fire or scintillation. Now, an accomplished researcher has criticized the very scientific model on which the GIA study authors based their conclusions. In a letter to the editor in the Winter 1998 issue of GIA’s Gems & Gemology journal, Martin Haske says GIA’s use of three-dimensional hemispherical lighting represents a “fatal flaw” in the study. Haske, who designs and produces high-tech gemological equipment for jewelers and gem laboratories, recognized that the hemisphere, which covered the diamond and stopped at the girdle plane, favored shallow crown angles and possibly larger tables

This content is exclusive to JCK Pro subscribers. Subscribe now to access this and much more with discount code GOPRO21 for $199 for an entire year of access (reg. $249).


Already a JCK Pro? Log in

A JCK Pro subscription is your all-access pass to people and resources on the
cutting edge of the retail jewelry industry, from the industry authority you
know and trust

Learn about the Perks of JCK Pro

Log Out

Are you sure you want to log out?

CancelLog out