Favorite Jewelry from the AGTA Spectrum and Cutting Edge Awards
Last week, I viewed jewelry submissions to the American Gem Trade Association’s (AGTA) annual Spectrum and Cutting Edge Awards. This year marked the venue’s 25th anniversary. For those unfamiliar with the Awards, they are an opportunity for big names and newcomers alike to demonstrate their talent in the design of colored gemstone jewelry and the unique and expert cutting of loose colored stones.

Hundreds of entries are judged across 19 different categories, including Evening Wear, and judges come from all corners of industry—manufacturing, editorial, and lapidary. Nearly all of the submissions are beautiful and expertly crafted, but every year, I always walk away from the awards thinking that many of the pieces (including winning pieces) appeal to too-specific target niches and customers, even though the awards are supposed to be a showcase for innovative and saleable creations. This is my opinion, and I encourage others to weigh in on the topic.
Each year when I see all of the submissions versus what has been selected to receive top honors, I wonder how much salability factors into the judging process. For example, this year’s Best in Show piece—the most outstanding piece of jewelry from the entire body of submissions—is a carved, natural-color green Turquoise horse head pin. I certainly see the skill in crafting the piece, know the stone’s color is rare and that the artist, Frederic Sage, makes beautiful jewelry. But, I wonder about the limited appeal of such a specific piece and its designation as the ‘best’ in the entire show. I think that the best piece of the show should be one that has a more mainstream appeal, and that many people can easily envision themselves owning and wearing.
At any rate, I’ll detail my favorites from the event and why I think they should inspire delight, purchases, and interest in the designers who made them. Being a colored gemstone competition, I liked a number of the pieces for the way they showed off extraordinary stones. Incredible focus points don’t need complicated settings because the stones will command attention. Overall, I pick jewelry to highlight that is well-made, generally attractive (which is somewhat subjective, of course), and is interesting and unusual without being far-out, hard to understand, or intimidating. A circle of white gold on a chain is kind of boring, but an intricate gemstone likeness of a reptile might be too specific to appreciate by most. And since a jeweler’s goal is to sell and a collector’s aim is to garner compliments, the aesthetics we create are meaningful.
All photos were taken by me at the press preview.
Number One in Evening Wear and the Best of Show
The Enchanted Stallion brooch features a 158.26 ct. t.w. natural-color Turquoise, colorless diamonds, and Demantoid garnets set in 18k green and white gold. This piece took the top spot in Evening Wear and is the Best of Show pick. I am curious about its widespread appeal to the jewelry-buying public. Frederic Sage, www.FredericSage.com. 
Evening Wear Category

The combination of rose gold with the orangey oval-cut stone and colorless melee make this ring feminine and pretty—very girly. Padparadscha sapphire in 18k gold with diamonds. Judy Evans for Philip Zahm Designs, www.philipzahm.com. 
This ring and stone look very German (read sleek) to me. The unadorned, bold white setting is ideal to show off the expertly-cut stone. Marquise-cut green Beryl with diamonds in 18k gold. Scott Keating Designs, www.scottkeating.com. 
I love these earrings because they are pearls (of course) and because the pair will punctuate a black cocktail dress with just the right dash of color. Cultured pearls with spinels, tourmalines, citrines, amethysts, and sapphires in 14k gold. Alejandra Solomone for Alejandra Jewels, www.alejandrajewels.com. 
The yellow diamond and orangey sapphire are an interesting color combination, and the blackened platinum setting gives the piece a bit of Goth feel. A 5.08 ct. t.w. Padparadscha sapphire, yellow pear-shape diamonds, and colorless melee, are set in platinum. Christopher Duquet Fine Jewelry Designs, www.christopherduquet.com. 
Oversize cuts of pink and red stones make this pretty, supersized three-stone style easy to appreciate. However, I think the ring is better for the Classic or Day Wear categories, not Evening Wear. Sapphire center stone with rhodolite garnet side stones in 14k gold. Sara L. Edgington for Mark Loren Designs, www.marklorendesigns.com.


Tahitian pearls, so of course I love them; these come with complimentary-color gems that frame the pearls. These could be worn during the day, too, with few other accessories. Tahitian pearls with zircons, tourmalines, aquamarines, tsavorite garnets, and diamonds. Mimi Favre for Favre Studio, (610) 296-5569, http://www.jhmusegallery.com/html/artistresults.asp?artist=53&testing=true.

This pendant necklace is beautifully made (you can tell from the pic that it was fabricated, not cast) and has a pretty-color center stone with a fabulous cut. Rose Quartz center set in platinum with colorless side stones. Karen Arthur for Oliver & Espig Jewelers, www.oliverandespig.com. 
The picture does not do the piece justice. The quartz center stone has some cool inclusions which have been expertly cut as focal points. 18k white gold and palladium “Medusa” pendant features a 11.13 ct. t.w. quartz with black and colorless diamonds. Frederic Sage (again), www.fredericsage.com. This young jeweler manages to collect design awards every year. 
This is my personal Best in Show. I love the use of the small pearls, unusual to see in a ring, and the platinum mounting is perfect for iridescent beauties. The underside has a nice gallery, too. This ring is fantastic for bridal, and for me! Multi-colored natural pearls are set in platinum with pavé. Monili, www.jewelrybymonili.com. 

Okay, I know I’m a little obsessed with pearls, but these pearls have karat-gold petals matching the flakes’ natural shapes and are set with colored stones. Keshi pearls with 18k rose gold petals, tourmalines, and cognac diamonds. Russ Hollander Master Goldsmith, www.ringart.com.


Day Wear Category

This pretty pendant would show up beautifully against a black or white blouse and small earrings to compliment the colors in the necklace. It’s a great focal point to an outfit. 18k yellow gold with red enamel, green tourmaline, red sapphires, and colorless melee. Gennadiy Berdnik (818-765-5237) and Andrew Sarosi (www.andrewsarosi.com).
Editor’s Note: I can’t find Berdnik’s web site, anybody know it? 
This pretty pendant features an unusual, long rectangular cut of moonstone. The piece would look great as the focal point of a dark-color ensemble. Moonstone and diamonds in 18k gold. Michelle Valadon Design.
Editor’s Note: I can’t find any contact info for her.
The random shapes of moonstone cabochons set in yellow gold are unusual and pretty. Moonstones are great because they’re less expensive than many other stones and are very pretty. The finish on the gold is also neat—it’s rough, and reminds me of sandpaper (which I consider a good thing since I like to refinish furniture). 18.08 cts. t.w. moonstone in 18k yellow gold. Vahe Ghazarian for Pure Carbon, www.purcarbon.com. 

This citrine is cut in such an interesting way that it needs no other adornment. I also like the matching yellow cord it’s strung on. 45.96 ct. t.w. lemon quartz in 14k white and green gold. Michael Ponthieux for Ponthieux’s Jewelry Design Studio, www.ponthieuxs.com. 
More Tahitians, but smaller ones and they are set in a pretty tri-color-gold lariat. The small diamond accents in the chain add just the right amount of sparkle. Tahitian pearls in 18k white, rose, and green gold with diamonds. Pamela Froman for Pamela Froman Fine Jewelry, www.pamelafroman.com. 
This center stone looks like moonstone in the pic, but it’s actually a star sapphire. The contrasting yellow gold setting and colorless accents really make the stones pop, more so than they would in a matching cool-tone metal. 3.30 ct. t.w. Star Sapphire with diamonds in 22k yellow gold. Michael Endlich for Pave Fine Jewelry, www.pavefinejewelry.com. 
This ring features a clever use of multiple types of stones. The style reminds me a little bit of Mark Patterson’s Samba collection, but these stones are much larger, and, the overall look isn’t delicate—it’s bold. Peridot, tourmalines, and garnet with diamonds in 18k yellow gold. Leslie Steinweiss for Julius Cohen Jeweler, www.juliuscohen.com. 
Bridal Wear Category

One of the sole diamond-only entries in the competition, this engagement ring is delicate-looking but the blackened metal setting keeps it from being overly feminine. 3.11 ct. t.w. cushion-cut diamond and melee in platinum. Erica Courtney, www.ericacourtney.com. 
Blackened metal and stones contrast the feminine styling of the piece, which would make a great mate for the previous ring. 7.78 ct. t.w. black diamond with colorless stones on a diamond chain, all metal is 18k black gold. Yehouda Saketkhou for Yael Designs, www.yaeldesigns.com. 
The mix of diamond shapes, including trapezoids, is interesting and the total carat weight—nearly 5 carats—make the earrings über luxurious for any bride. Trapezoid, marquise, fancy baguette, and round diamonds are set in platinum. Ricardo Basta Jewels by Bernier, www.ricardobasta.com.

Classical Designs

The tall, high-polished bezel mounting that frames the stone creates a modern look, and, reminds me a little of a Reeses Peanut Butter Cup (always a good thing). 7.85 ct. t.w. tourmaline in 14k yellow gold with diamond accents. Lynda Rasco for Harvest Gold Jewelry, www.harvestgoldgallery.com. 

Men’s Wear

These cufflinks are a fantastic use of Meteorite—that funky and uncommon find that you typically only see in big chunks at the Tucson gem shows. Meteorite is ideal for guys, because it’s sleek, unusual, and has a high-tech look. Meteorite in 19k white gold. Andrew Costen for Costen Catbalue Goldsmiths, www.costencatbalue.com. 
This palladium and Tahitian pearl pendant is a big, edgy look that can be carried off by the right guy (I’m thinking our art director, Todd Gast). 12.55 mm Tahitian pearl in palladium. H. Gio Giovanni for Blacksmith & Co., www.blacksmithandcompany.com. 
Best Use of Pearls
More pearls, so, yep, I’m down with this piece. In particular, the pearls are top quality (you can see your reflection in them in person), the diamonds add just enough sparkle for interest, and the design is simple (swirls) without being boring because the maker mixed three unlikely colors—yellow, white, and peacock. Platinum and 18k yellow gold Celebration ring features a South Sea, golden South Sea, and two Tahitian pearls accented with colorless and yellow diamonds. James W. Currens for J.W. Currens Inc., (212) 944-1222.

Best Use of Color and Most Fashion Forward
The technical skill that went into making this piece is impressive. The maker set individual colored stones and pavé in between two halves of clear quartz before mounting the entire cabochon into a ring. The finished piece is bright, happy, and sort of Pucci-esque. Platinum Kaleidescope X2 ring features an 85 ct. t.w. crystal enclosing diamonds, amethysts, aquamarines, fire opals, topaz, citrines, garnets, and tourmalines. James W. Currens for J.W. Currens Inc., (212) 944-1222.


Platinum Honors
This brooch/pendant is just plain pretty. The skill in creating the individual platinum leaves and setting each with such specific stones requires patience and a good eye for detail and color (the gradation of hues is truly beautiful). Platinum brooch/pendant features a .57 ct. t.w. brown diamond, yellow diamonds, rubies, pink and yellow sapphires, and colorless diamonds. Michael daCosta for Fortune’s Fine Jewellery Ltd., www.fortunes.com. 
Jennifer Heebner commented:
That's good to know, thanks. Since they were not labeled that way
by AGTA, I wasn't sure if they were Tahitians or dyed black
freshwaters, thus the generic name. I'm unfamiliar with this
variety, so I'll look them up. Thanks!
Douglas McLaurin commented:
I just want to add that Alejandra's earrings (entry 153 for evening
wear) use Sea of Cortez Pearls or "Cortez Pearls"...they are not
just "cultured pearls". I don't understand why all other pearls are
given their full denomination (i.e. "Tahitian Black Pearl") and
these had to be labeled just as "generic". Do not be afraid to call
them with their name.
Hedda Schupak commented:
Ok, I have to say I don't entirely agree with either Jen or Robert
on this matter. Jewelry design competitions are intended to push
the edges of convention and spur creativity beyond the boundaries
of what is presently marketable, otherwise we'd just have a lot of
people doing endless variations on what's already been done and
we'd have no freshness of design, ever. Unfortunately, that happens
already in some sectors of this industry. Look at apparel: most
fashion runway shows feature clothes that are not the same garments
that actually show up in stores. Even a recent example--Michelle
Obama's black-and-red lava dress, straight off Narciso Rodriguez's
runway--was sold to her at a much longer length than it was
originally shown. Competition pieces of jewelry are intended to
inspire a production line, not be a production line. At the same
time, especially in an industry that's slow to embrace newness, I
do see the value of having specific competition categories where
salability and wearability are the qualifications for winning a
prize.
Adam Graham - AGTA commented:
In the 25 years of the Spectrum Awards, the competition has
undergone many evolutions and will be sure to evolve in the future
based on feedback from participants and onlookers alike. The
Spectrum Awards competition often yields interesting winning pieces
chosen by judges that never repeat from year to year and are pulled
from all corners of the industry. We believe that this provides a
fresh, diverse perspective when judging the entries each year. This
year, we have even included the consumer in the judging mix by
offering Consumer Choice Honors, the judging of which is currently
being done in conjunction with the Jewelry Consumer Opinion
Council. We crave input on the competition and the submissions. As
Jennifer stated, we host members of the consumer and trade press
along with stylists and designers from the television and movie
industry to view every piece entered. As you would expect, each
person will have their own views as to which pieces they would have
chosen as winners. Some agreed with our judges, some didn’t,
but each participant gained valuable exposure just by
participating. To address the issue of mass appeal in winning
pieces, we created the Manufacturing Honors division in each
category that picks the most saleable pieces that would be best
suited as part of a line. We encourage everyone to weigh in on the
competition as it provides us with valuable information in
continuing to build on the success of the past 25 years.
Robert Leser commented:
It goes without saying that jewelry design comepetitions are ego
quests for recognition and alot of free advertising. Winning awards
bolsters a designer's contention that he is in fact a cut above the
herd. I am guilty of all of this and perhaps more. I have won
awards for things that don't sell. I call them ego pieces. Having
made enough of those and watched as the money invested in them was
slow to recoup I have stopped making and entering these kinds of
items. For me, if it isn't a winner in my line, I am not submitting
it. In this year's results I agree that widespread appeal was not a
factor in some of the judging. Perhaps "best execution" should be a
category for the beautiful with low saleability. Also perhaps the
judging should be done exclusively by a panel of retailers.



















