Log In   |  Register Free Newsletter Subscription
Skip navigation
Zibb
Subscribe to JCK Online

Customer Watch: Luxury Logo Flaunting Isn’t Cool – For Now, Anyway

January 14, 2009

In the consumer press these days you’ll find murmurings of a new trend: That flaunting one’s very ability to afford new trends has become decidedly unchic. According to Kristin Tillotson writing in the Minneapolis Star Tribune, New Yorkers are buying scarves at Hermes and asking for generic bags in which to carry them home. “Sashaying down the street with a telltale Tiffany-blue box . . . could get you arrested in the public court of opinion. Flaunting is out, shame shopping is in.”

 

“Luxury goods are the new porn, things that must be hidden behind plain brown wrappers,” she adds. 

                    

 

Tillotson quotes Milton Pedraza, CEO of the Luxury Institute, which bills itself as "the global voice of the high-net-worth consumer": "The shame of Wall Street casts a negative shadow on Main Street wealth. All the executive excess and Ponzi schemes have created this atmosphere that no one who’s wealthy has earned their money. . . .”

 

And therefore, goes the reasoning, the apparent ability to spend big bucks on items of conspicuous consumption is just not chic.

 

But when even the bricks-and-mortar stores of designers such as Prada, which traditionally never hold sales, shock the fashion world by placing sale signs in their windows, and reportedly only Versace bucks the designer trend of slashing prices on ready-to-wear in this global recession, suddenly the hoi polloi can find and perhaps even afford bargains where they never shopped before.

 

So really, doesn’t it make sense, that because the public can purchase certain luxury items at 50, 60, 75, 80 percent off, that they don’t really count as luxury purchases? There’s significantly less cache in carrying a shopping bag from a store discounting 80 percent.

 

Under this reasoning, it seems that the status quo remains undisturbed.

 

Tillotson concludes that the trend away from luxury logo purchases is cyclical and adds: “Word to the wealthy: Just admit you have it, and continue spending it to make up for those who can’t.”

 

The bottom line is that beautiful, well-made goods – logo or not - are always going to be desirable, no matter the shopping bag into which they are placed.

 

Posted by Cynthia Sliwa on January 14, 2009 | Comments (1)

January 19, 2009
In response to: Customer Watch: Luxury Logo Flaunting Isn’t Cool – For Now, Anyway
DRUFFO commented:

FIRST OF ALL I THINK IT IS IMPERITIVE, ESPECIALLY TODAY THAT SHOPPERS OF HIGH END ITMES BECOME INFORMED IN WHAT THEY ARE PURCHASING, BEFORE THEY PURCHASE THAT ITEM. WHEATHER IT BE A HIGH END WATCH, A DIAMOND RING OR A SUIT. YOU MUST KNOW WHY THAT ITEM IS PROCLAIMED SO MUCH BETTER AND THUS SO MUCH MORE EXPENSIVE. KNOWLEDGE IS A GREAT WEAPON! THEN, IF AND WHEN IT GOES ON SALE AND YOU CAN AFFORD IT YOU REALLY ARE GETTING A BARGAIN.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
marketing module graphic
Advertisement
JCK Las Vegas Show
JCK NEWSLETTERS
JCKnews



Please read our Privacy Policy

About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscriptions   |   Affiliate Links   |   RSS
© 2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites