Log In   |  Register Free Newsletter Subscription
Skip navigation
Zibb
Subscribe to JCK Online

Is Jewelry Advertising Going Too Far?

January 4, 2008

A while ago we had a fairly lively discussion over a Helzberg ad, and some of the comments it inspired on the web.  (Even the ad’s star joined in, apparently.)

Along those lines, I am starting to see a backlash against the familiar tropes of diamond advertising. Check out these posts (and before clicking, I warn you these posts have VERY explicit language) here and here.

As we all know, this industry is based on the idea that diamonds equal love, and by implication sex. But is this being spelled out too explicitly?

For example, check out the ad below from the De Beers retail chain, referenced in (and marked up by) one of the posts:

 

 

And then there is this online ad – which is noteworthy because it got the jeweler sued

There aren’t many ads that require a parental discretion notice but well, you’ll see:
.

 

All right, I’ll admit, that ad is pretty amusing, but we may be starting to skate on some pretty thin ice here. What do you think?

Posted by Rob Bates on January 4, 2008 | Comments (1)

January 4, 2008
In response to: Is Jewelry Advertising Going Too Far?
Dr. Hoffman commented:

I'll take whatever diamond necklace she's wearing. No seriously, the ad is tacky. But the lawsuit is ridiculous.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
marketing module graphic
Advertisement
JCK Las Vegas Show
JCK NEWSLETTERS
JCKnews



Please read our Privacy Policy

About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscriptions   |   Affiliate Links   |   RSS
© 2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites