Subscribe to JCK Magazine
Cutting Remarks   


Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (3)


De Beers Gets Into the Lab Business
May 1, 2008


So the big news in the De Beers Group's latest release on the Forevermark is it will be starting a lab.

 

Yes, a lab. Just like GIA, and IGI, and all the others .... (There had been buzz on this; see here.)

 

The plan is to have two grading labs, one based in Antwerp, the other in the company’s research facility in Maidenhead.

 

Is this competition for GIA and company? Well, Ellie Goss, head of global public relations for De Beers Group marketing, notes that, while the other labs view grading as a business in itself, the grading here is only a feature to back up the Forevermark. In addition, the lab will only grade Forevermark diamonds (which have to be 18 points, J, SI2, "good" cut, and above).

 

Here are more details, thanks to Goss:

 

- The company has hired a group of gemologists for the lab with over “600 years total” of experience. No names yet.

 

- “The certificates are meant to be something that consumers will keep and cherish, not just file away with insurance documents,” Goss says.

 

- Regarding the always thorny issue of cut grading, Goss says that De Beers will first use the GIA’s system, then possibly evolve its own.

 

- The Forevermark’s business model has changed. While in the past, De Beers charged diamantaires to get their diamonds “marked,” now retailers that will install Forevermark boutiques in their stores and then pay a royalty to De Beers. “The reason for this is we found most of the profits were at the retail end, so it makes sense that’s where we charged the royalty,” Goss says.

 

- The Forevermark will now take up virtually all of De Beers Group's marketing budget, except in America, where it’s “business as usual,” Goss says.  

 

Thank you, Ellie. The other big issue here is that labs are meant to give independent opinions. But the Forevermark lab will grade diamonds supplied by its business partners, which certainly leaves it open to being compromised. Goss says that, “De Beers has a reputation and won’t do anything to damage that.” And certainly some would argue that Tiffany has been grading its own diamonds for years.

 

Forevermark is currently being offered in Hong Kong, China, Japan, Taiwan and India. There is more info on what the Forevermark stands for here.


Posted by Rob Bates on May 1, 2008 | Comments (3)


May 5, 2008
In response to: De Beers Gets Into the Lab Business
Mike commented:

It very unfortunate that a company which is only now starting to clean up its image, has once again dropped the ball.




May 5, 2008
In response to: De Beers Gets Into the Lab Business
Roy Cohen commented:

I find it difficult to believe that DeBeers, a company whose name is synonymous with diamonds, would be considering grading its own diamonds and selling such. Such practice has long been considered a conflict of interest by all in the diamond industry. Diamonds need to be graded by independent laboratories in order to avoid a situation where the seller can preferentially grade his or her own goods. Even though DeBeers would undoubtedly be doing things correctly and above board, they would be setting a very dangerous precedent. As leaders in the diamond industry and as one of the gatekeepers protecting consumer confidence, there is more likely a misunderstanding of what their intentions are. Diamond Grading Lab Ownership WFDB Newsletter, Edition 1 March 2003 At the meeting, a question was tabled whether a diamantaire can operate as partial or sole owner of a diamond-grading laboratory. After discussing this issue at length, the Executive Committee felt that, while it certainly is not illegal, such a situation represents a strong conflict of interest and borders on what could be considered an unethical practice. The Executive Committee urged member bourses to dissuade their members from allowing themselves to attain such positions.




May 6, 2008
In response to: De Beers Gets Into the Lab Business
Mall Jewelry Boy commented:

Tiffany grades their own stones in their own gem lab. Supposedly they can pull it off because they are "regularly certified by independent quality system auditors from the International Organization for Standardization", and (after examinations, third-party lab reports, and such) they will give a refund or provide a higher quality diamond if the grading is proved inaccurate.





POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.
Please restrict submissions to less than 7,000 characters (including any HTML formatting).

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


Advertisement

Advertisements



Directory/Buyers Guide

JCKstyle



©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites