Subscribe to JCK Magazine
Cutting Remarks   


Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (1)


Is Jewelry Advertising Going Too Far?
January 4, 2008

A while ago we had a fairly lively discussion over a Helzberg ad, and some of the comments it inspired on the web.  (Even the ad's star joined in, apparently.)

Along those lines, I am starting to see a backlash against the familiar tropes of diamond advertising. Check out these posts (and before clicking, I warn you these posts have VERY explicit language) here and here.

As we all know, this industry is based on the idea that diamonds equal love, and by implication sex. But is this being spelled out too explicitly?

For example, check out the ad below from the De Beers retail chain, referenced in (and marked up by) one of the posts:

 

 



And then there is this online ad – which is noteworthy because it got the jeweler sued

There aren’t many ads that require a parental discretion notice but well, you'll see:
.

 


All right, I'll admit, that ad is pretty amusing, but we may be starting to skate on some pretty thin ice here. What do you think?


Posted by Rob Bates on January 4, 2008 | Comments (1)


January 4, 2008
In response to: Is Jewelry Advertising Going Too Far?
Dr. Hoffman commented:

I'll take whatever diamond necklace she's wearing. No seriously, the ad is tacky. But the lawsuit is ridiculous.





POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.
Please restrict submissions to less than 7,000 characters (including any HTML formatting).

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


Advertisement

Advertisements



Directory/Buyers Guide

JCKstyle



©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites