Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Most Commented On
Archives
Blog
Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (10)
Two Bidders for Whitehall?July 17, 2008
However, that lawyer also mentions ...
... the going concern bid that we did receive ... is a hybrid bid. It contemplates a go-forward relationship for a core amount of stores, but for the unprofitable stores, they have partnered up with a liquidator. (p. 30)
Later in the hearing (p. 163), a lawyer for Gitanjali USA announces that it is the "going-concern" bidder, together with Gordon Brothers. Gitanjali, an India-based sightholder, also owns Samuels and Rogers; its interest in Whitehall has been previously reported. The second bidder was not identified. The auction is set to take place July 31.
Most of the latter part of the hearing was taken up with consignment issues, which I’ve talked about here and here and are still up in the air. Whitehall's arguments are here (docket 314); I also commend this analysis which argues that, if Whitehall is able to lay claim to consignment goods, it will hurt other jewelers that depend on memo merchandise.
Posted by Rob Bates on July 17, 2008 | Comments (10)
July 17, 2008
In response to: Two Bidders for Whitehall? Mall Jewelry Boy commented: So there's hope for at least some of the stores to continue (and thus, employees to continue their employment). But even if Whitehall is bought by Gitanjali, we might still see a large number of store closures. I wonder how many of the Friedman's/Crescent stores are still profitable with Whitehall/Lundstrom merchandise and credit systems?
July 21, 2008
In response to: Two Bidders for Whitehall? stuart kerzner commented: if the judge in this case allows the memo goods to be sold (and even to segregate the funds until he makes a decision) this judge should be held accountable for stupidity and judicial fraud. merchandise that does not belong to a bankrupt company must be returned to its rightful owner, what so hard for this idiotic judge to understand.
July 28, 2008
In response to: Two Bidders for Whitehall? CrankyDave commented: I would be quite surprised if the judge did not rule in Whitehall's favor. They've far more "legal" ground than simply the use of 2 "L's" as seems to be being painted. Not suggesting its "right" or "wrong".
July 30, 2008
In response to: Two Bidders for Whitehall? IY commented: Second bidder is the current Whitehall Presidents group with more Investors. close all underperforming stores, and leave open the few whitehalls and lundstrums that turn a profit along with the friedmans they bought. Buy at the blowout sale and reopen profitable as can be! They are praying the Indian group folds .
July 31, 2008
In response to: Two Bidders for Whitehall? peace out commented: last comment. i sure wish i knew where you got your info. i hope you are someone who is telling the truth. i know you wont reveal yourself..but please tell how viable your info is?
July 31, 2008
In response to: Two Bidders for Whitehall? soon2be? commented: Hey, Peace out probally will never know where the info came from, if it came from any source..... or they just don't have the A-- to back it up !!!!!
July 31, 2008
In response to: Two Bidders for Whitehall? IY commented: Downtown Chicago
July 31, 2008
In response to: Two Bidders for Whitehall? peace out commented: downtown chicago tells me that you ae in our corporate office. this news is good for all of us who were in the friedmans acquisition. do you think they will retain all of the friedmans locations even if we have done poorly since the acquisition..and if so does this mean that the big guns are aware that the Friedmans stores have bascially been ignored and do not have the proper tools to be successful?
August 1, 2008
In response to: Two Bidders for Whitehall? soon2be? commented: So true Peace Out, With the old Friedmans sign still up, (inside and out) no Whitehall fliers to distribute no one has the incentive to sell,how can the employee's care about a sale when your not even sure that you will get paid for your efforts!!! with the conditions as they have been it's really hard to go into a store and get excited about ANYTHING !!!
August 1, 2008
In response to: Two Bidders for Whitehall? IY commented: Yes, those are good solid stores that everyone knows have been "parked" for now. Sorry the same can't be said for 70% of the whitehall stores. Many,many will be closed, quickly. There are malls with the two names (lundstrum & whitehall) that will both close due to poor leases and subpar sales that have been allowed to deteriorate without addressing it. Unfortunately this is the only way to get rid of these unprofitable stores. Hopefully a good solid company emerges with people that actually know what these stores should be selling.
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
|