Subscribe to JCK Magazine
Behind The Counter   


Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (2)


Call to Action Part 1: Why Are We So Hungry For Brands?
May 14, 2007

I’ve noticed the trend of jewelers desperately wanting to exclusively carry certain products…Why?

  1. Jewelers figure if my store is the only one in the area that carries Hearts on Fire, Tacori, Scott Kay, Yurman, Judith Ripka, Rolex, Breitling, etc that I will gain a share of the market where other’s can’t compete…because they don’t have it.
  2. These brands offer to add your company name as a tagline in their magazine ad, TV, and internet.
  3. These brands are “door openers,” they have people coming through the doors and once their in it doesn’t matter what they buy.

So these are the reasons huh? Why not get independents advertising together without taglines. No…not a bunch of stores added to the bottom of an ad. Not a commercial for a single brand. And not an ad for certain products in a certain city. Instead, ad’s that harp on the emotional appeal of diamonds and jewelry.

Instead, of spending “crap loads” of money into single brands that often offer a slower turnover…why not band together and market together. The only professional ads I see when it comes to diamonds are DeBeers ads. (The newest Journey one where the man wakes up in the middle of the morning and puts his loved one a Journey diamond pendant while she sleeps…simple and it works. The lovey dovey music, the woman sleeping, the man surprising her and the diamond….simple and it works).

Independents alone might not have enough money but together I’m sure a bunch of us can clearly depict through advertising, the emotional appeal diamonds, jewelry, and colored stones offer—making consumers put aside the notion that diamonds and jewelry are over priced…like barackus said:

“People in the jewelry business have been ruining their image for a very long time. We are poor marketers of our product lines. We have few identifiable brands like leather goods have. Most can spot a Louis Vuitton, Prada, Coach, Dooney & Burke, etc bag and immediately know the brand, the expense, and the quality. Because of that immediate recognition and cache, that accompanies it, affluent women have no problem spending upwards of $1000 on a handbag. Do you hear them question the markup in that category? These companies have taken a long-term approach, and invested considerable time and money in developing the brand recognition. In our industry, we are dealing with virtually all private label products that are unrecognizable by most of the public, again with few exceptions. Since the aforementioned leather goods companies have developed their brand, they certainly don’t want to damage it by offering promotional sales. They also understand that once the customer gets conditioned to frequent sales, it does not take long until they are not buying unless there is a sale.”

I couldn’t have said it better myself.

So, why don’t independents market diamonds together? Why do we rely on brand names—few that are recognizable? More marketing leads to more people noticing the emotional appeal, and we have a bunch of bright jewelry storeowners…so why not band together...and advertise together the emotional appeal diamonds and jewelry offer. Do you see push presents being advertised…simple it works…I know it takes money and independents together can do it? What about college graduations…diamond studs are a must for entering the work field? Dad’s and mom’s passing on their diamond pieces that are fashionable today…that antique etching or micro-pave ring or a watch…simple and it works? (shanu@gulianis.com)


Posted by Shanu Singh Guliani on May 14, 2007 | Comments (2)


May 15, 2007
In response to: Call to Action Part 1: Why Are We So Hungry For Brands?
Jennifer Heebner commented:

Advertising jewelry and not necessarily specific brands of jewelry for specific occasions, such as push presents for the birth of child, is a great idea. Plus, advertise to specific individuals, such as female self purchasers. Any, all, and more jewelry advertising is a great idea! The Yurman brand is young compared to Tiffany and Cartier, but every one of my girlfriends (not in industry) knows his name because he advertises so much.




May 17, 2007
In response to: Call to Action Part 1: Why Are We So Hungry For Brands?
Jonathan Simons commented:

Branding is a marketing response to the adolescent emotional need for belonging. This is a valuable tool in reaching the 2nd largest segment of human society. Most people never get past this stage of development so it's an easy go to for results. The only factor more powerful than the need to belong is fear, which is implemented usually by political or religious bodies when the previous doesn't work. Fear only works in jewelry when guilt items are bought. There are a few retailers actually starting to use this lever in their advertising. There's one national chain that implies marital disharmony if you shopped anywhere else than their store. Brands let people know how important and ultimately valuable you are in your clique and to your clique. It's a modern form of tribal or caste affiliation.





POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.
Please restrict submissions to less than 7,000 characters (including any HTML formatting).

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


Advertisement

Advertisements



Directory/Buyers Guide

JCKstyle



©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites