Link This |
Email this |
Blog This |
Comments (5)
The 9,000th Example that the WDC "Blood Diamond" Campaign Has Backfired
November 30, 2006
May 2006:
"We think it's better to embrace this movie, to turn it to our advantage."
- Rory More O'Ferrall at the World Diamond Council meeting in Sicily, talking about the "Blood Diamond"
December 2006: Q: Did you anticipate the voracity of the response of the international diamond industry against this film? They seem to be mounting a campaign against it.
DICAPRIO ... I had never anticipated, no, that it would be this intense, by any means.
- ABC News
Oh man. Shouldn't the first rule of damage control be "do no harm"? Well, this campaign has done a lot of harm.
Though you gotta hand it to the damage control experts at Sitrick and Company (now 42West.) Some variation of the words "Allan Mayer," "Sitrick and Company" and "Hollywood's top spinmeisters" appears in almost every article about this film. But the message of this campaign -- that diamonds have done good for Africa -- I'm not seeing that quite so much.
I am not saying that the industry shouldn't have thought about its response to this film. But publicly announcing a damage control campaign, placing ads for the website, and fretting about the movie openly, seems to have been a big mistake.
And for the record, I'm sympathetic to this campaign and its goals. I can't imagine how this looks to the outside world.
Further thoughts on this here.
Posted by Rob Bates on November 30, 2006 | Comments (5)