Subscribe to JCK Magazine
Style 360   


Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (2)


Celebs Blasted for Wearing Diamonds
January 23, 2007

I’m confused. I mean, I saw "Blood Diamond". I’ve kept up with the seemingly daily industry commentary about it. And I am 100% behind the industry and its consumers doing absolutely E-V-E-R-Y-T-H-I-N-G possible to avoid ever repeating the horrors depicted in the film.

That said, I’m a little lost as to how we got from the point where film-makers and stars were urging the public to not boycott diamonds (and thus hurt the already fragile African economy) to the point where Jennifer Lopez and Beyonce are being blasted by “humanitarian groups” for wearing diamonds to the Golden Globes.


The two wore diamonds as part of the Diamond Information Center’s Raise Your Right Hand Ring for Africa campaign, in which the DIC donates to African charities in exchange for wearing diamonds. The initiative aims to increase awareness and education about how diamonds are vital to the key diamond-producing nations around the world, particularly in Africa.

Groups like Global Witness lashed out at the celebs and the DIC immediately, labeling it as a P.R. move to counteract bad publicity generated by "Blood Diamond".

Okaaaaay, and the point is?

The stars are wearing diamonds and assuring the public—perhaps those who are a little wary after seeing the film—that it is okay to wear diamonds. That not every piece of jewelry was created in exchange for someone’s limb.

If we’re all in agreement that boycotting diamonds and leaving African countries without their primary source of income is NOT the answer, why is promoting diamonds “rather disgusting” as one Global Witness campaigner reportedly called it.

I find what happened in Sierra Leone disgusting. And I am not proud that the industry didn’t have a quicker or swifter response at the time. I also realize that we need to continue to police ourselves and the diamond supply chain to help improve conditions for those living in diamond producing nations. But to the humanitarian groups riding this wave of publicity and trying to dry up diamond demand with moves like criticizing J. Lo or Beyonce for promoting the gems, I ask what you hope to accomplish if stars, jewelers and the public stop buying diamonds? What happens to the survivors of that bloody war and those in other African nations dependent on the diamond trade?

To J. Lo and Beyonce, I say, Go Girls! And, to reassure you both, just know that I, too, was out on the town sporting my diamonds last week! (Though not on a red carpet. And there was no paparazzi. And my diamond earrings are so small you have to be standing really close to see them. But, still... )


Posted by Carrie Soucy on January 23, 2007 | Comments (2)


January 24, 2007
In response to: Celebs Blasted for Wearing Diamonds
Hedda Schupak commented:

I've been reluctant to say this for a long time, because I didn't want to give Global Witness and the like an opportunity to twist the meaning of my words, but given that, as Carrie says, all parties involved with the movie have agreed that boycotting diamonds isn't the answer, and the movie itself made the point that what went on in Sierra Leone was merely business as usual for Africa and the fact that it was diamonds and not any other commodity was coincidental, I'm finally just going to say it: Global Witness also has a responsibility to ensure the continuation of Global Witness. So call their latest hue and cry a case of highly enlightened self-interest, if you will, because if the conflict diamond issue goes away, then Global Witness's raison d'etre also goes away, or at least until it can find another pressing issue to work on. One would think there would be many of those, but given how much the conflict diamond issue has helped publicize GW, it's not likely they're going to want to give up their cash cow, is it? I always thought it would be very poor form to say it outright, and as Carrie said, we at JCK are at the forefront of wanting to ensure that diamonds are mined and traded only for good and joy and prosperity, not horror and suffering and death--but poor form or not, it needs to be said.




January 24, 2007
In response to: Celebs Blasted for Wearing Diamonds
Rob Bates commented:

Hedda, I actually just posted similar thoughts on the JCK Voices blog, but I would like to disagree with you on one point, and I really don't think maybe you meant as I am interpreting it: What happened in Sierra Leone is NOT business as usual for Africa. I think the movie kind of gives that impression to some extent, and that is wrong. One of the things that Russell Simmons said that I agree with is that movies like this make people think that all Africa is non-stop warfare and there is no good side to the continent. Just the other day I was making that point to my friend, and he said, "There is a good side to Africa?" Yes, there is, though I don't necessarily blame him for not hearing about it. Anyway, the larger point I want to make is, regardless of how many other commodities were involved in warfare, we have the responsibility to make sure ours is used in the best way possible. Let the col-tan and oil industries worry about themselves. When the "conflict diamond" issue first surfaced, many people said "It is always going to be that way." I think we've learned that it doesn't have to be that way, and we have to keep working to change things for the better.





POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.
Please restrict submissions to less than 7,000 characters (including any HTML formatting).

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


Advertisement

Advertisements



Directory/Buyers Guide

JCKstyle



©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites