Log In   |  Register Free Newsletter Subscription
Skip navigation
Zibb
Subscribe to JCK Online
Talkback

Whitehall Considers Bankruptcy Protection

By JCK Online Staff -- JCK Online, June 17, 2008

Whitehall Jewelers, Inc., the wholly owned subsidiary of Whitehall Jewelers Holdings, Inc., said Monday that it has received two default notices, which have triggered a number of events with its lenders and vendors that may force the company to seek bankruptcy protection.

In an 8-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission Monday, the jewelry retail chain said that on June 11 it received a default notice for its failure to make payment on a $3.06 million promissory note to Fabrikant Receivables, LLC, and a default notice for its failure to make payment on a $2.07 million promissory note from Rosy Blue, Inc. Both notes were issued by Whitehall to the two suppliers on April 20, 2007.

The Chicago-based company said it has until June 21 to pay these notices or be in default. If an agreement cannot be made they will be required to make full payments on the notes.

Whitehall also said in its filing it has additional unsecured trade debt with Fabrikant of approximately $1.5 million.

If Whitehall fails to pay off these loans and debts, it will be in default of its senior credit agreement with La Salle Bank and other lenders of $64.5 million outstanding, and its loan credit agreement with PWJ Lending LLC of $40 million outstanding.

However, if Whitehall pays or makes an agreement with Fabrikant and Rosy Blue, other vendors said they want similar payments, assurances, or agreement terms, or they will no longer provide merchandise to the company. According to the 8-K filing, Whitehall has $13.5 million in trade debt.

"If the company is unable to provide such additional payment assurances or does not agree to such accelerated payment terms, the company will likely be unable to maintain its inventory levels, which would have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or financial condition," Whitehall said in the SEC filing.

"Based on the company's cash on hand as well as current and anticipated cash flow from operations, the current borrowing availability under the Senior Credit Agreement is not adequate to meet the company's working capital and capital expenditure needs beyond the end of June 2008," Whitehall said in its filing. "Therefore, the company needs additional financing in the near term to fund its working capital and capital expenditure needs. The company is actively considering various financing options and may seek protection under the Federal Bankruptcy Code."

Post a comment      Return to article      View other article discussions

Submitted by: R More
2008-29-7 19:30:00
Location:
Occupation:

I''m not surprised at Whitehall''s troubles. I was employed by them for 11 years and saw this coming long ago.They are totally mismanaged from the very top to their district management. It''s too bad, they were once very different and stood out from the rest, now they look and act like a "Littman''s", Hugh Patinkin the former CEO had a great vision and I enjoyed that vision when he was still alive and head of the company. The" gang that cannot shoot straight",Dayoob and Co destroyed Whitehall.


Submitted by: Looking for a SaleAG
2008-22-6 22:29:00
Location:
Occupation:

Come on, If you have a job at this point value it! t with gas and food the way it is be THANKFUL!!! I'm one of those that went thru the ordeal with Friedmans now working with Whitehall, but I have to BELEAVE that when one door closes GOD opens another... Staying Strong and Looking Hopeful


Submitted by: Hanging on @ FRDM
2008-20-6 19:10:00
Location:
Occupation:

Wow Jewelman and Mallboy, those are harsh words. I hope for the sake of the employees and the vendors that they can pull out of this. God knows the liquidators don't need any more money or business.


Submitted by: Jewelman
2008-18-6 11:15:00
Location:
Occupation:

Whitehall like so many companies has been dangling on the edge of disaster for so long. The free enterprise system would be better off without "bankruptcy protection" Let the weak die off and the strong survive.


Submitted by: Mall Jewelry Boy
2008-17-6 18:42:00
Location:
Occupation:

They should have just let Friedman's crash and burn and not bother buying those stores. I'm sure all the manufacturers are looking at that 14+ million dollars and wondering why in the world they aren't seeing any of it. Isn't this exactly how the Friedman's liquidation started, with trade vendors demanding payment? Rosy Blue was one of the vendors that forced Friedman's into liquidation, right?



Post a comment      Return to article      View other article discussions

Advertisement
marketing module graphic
Advertisement
JCK Las Vegas Show
JCK NEWSLETTERS
JCKnews



Please read our Privacy Policy

About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscriptions   |   Affiliate Links   |   RSS
© 2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites