JA Redefines Relationship With Affiliates
By JCK Online Staff -- JCK Online, 6/19/2009 1:00:00 PM
Jewelers of America (JA) announced it is redefining the group’s relationship with the state and regional affiliate jewelers associations. The 39 affiliate associations will have the opportunity to continue their relationships with JA through new partnership agreements. Improved member benefits are set to be offered this fall as part of a recently announced merger with the Jewelry Information Center (JIC).
After careful evaluation during an 18-month strategic review completed last year, JA’s Board of Directors determined that the organization’s current business model was not sustainable to cover its operating costs. (Traditionally, JA has produced and developed the majority of services offered to members, yet it retains less than 20% [on average $12.21 per storefront in 2008] of the annual dues paid by member companies. JA remits the balance of annual dues back to the affiliate associations.)
In the new partnership model, JA will no longer offer operational assistance to affiliate associations, such as dues collection and database maintenance, but will continue a positive, ongoing relationship through other educational and marketing support.
Under the current structure, which will end on August 17, 2009, JA members have joint membership in their local jewelry association and the national organization. Going forward, members will elect to join or renew their membership with JA and/or their local association separately.
“While the current economic forecast has made it necessary to redefine the relationship Jewelers of America has with its affiliates, the association intends to continue a long-term connection with them through restructured agreements and future partnership opportunities,” says President & CEO Matthew A. Runci.
“[JA] will continually strive to strengthen and grow the partnerships it has with all state and regional jewelry associations, as it works to increase the benefits and services it offers to its membership. Our organizations share many of the same goals, [such as] … establishing and preserving high professional standards and the continuing and growing prosperity of our members,” JA Chairman John Green wrote in the notification sent to affiliate presidents.

JA President & CEO Matthew Runci.
JA will continue to focus on benefits that best address the current concerns of its member companies and to explore direct delivery options that are most convenient to them – in their stores, at local events or online. Examples include recent discounts on education and online training from some of the jewelry industry’s top education providers.
In other association news, JA is announced plans to launch a redesigned, more user-friendly website this fall. This will improve ease of access to all member services, including its exclusive regulatory and legislative guidance materials and online educational offerings from GIA and other education partners. ]
An important merger with the JIC is also planned. The merger promises to give members exciting access to high-quality consumer marketing materials and traffic-building programs. JIC members will receive equivalent access to JA benefits, as they will become JA members. More details on this integration will be announced soon. JA is also strengthening its efforts in Washington, D.C., to support the independent jeweler through legislative advocacy on key retail issues, such as sales tax fairness and group healthcare access.
-
There are some misunderstandings surrounding Jewelers of America’s partnerships and financial model, which I would like to clarify.
1. Jewelers of America does not own or operate a trade show. It sold the JA New York show more than 15 years ago and only receives a small annual royalty from its continued association with the show. The downturn in the economy, which has affected the entire industry, did not spare us. A loss of revenue has required Jewelers of America to make strategic economic decisions. As a non-profit association, our financial records are public, and we provide our financial report to members annually.
2. The state and regional jewelers associations have always been completely independent in their governance and separate in incorporation. Under the proposed new agreements, Jewelers of America has offered continued support to the state jewelers associations through some financial assistance for operating costs. We are optimistic that each state organization will elect to continue to work with us through new agreements, and we look forward to building a more mutually beneficial relationship with them.
3. Jewelers of America has had a long working relationship with the Jewelry Information Center (formerly Jewelry Industry Council). The leadership of both organizations chose to integrate in the best interest of their members. The results of the merger will be administrative cost savings and increased benefits to all members. Jewelers of America and Jewelry Information Center members have the opportunity to vote on this merger at the associations’ upcoming annual meetings.
Rob Headley - 2009-24-6 16:24:00 EDT -
"JA redefines its role with State Affiliates". HOW? By
letting States to go there own way. Why? JA doesn't
get enough dollars from State Jewelers, its members in
return. JA holds trade shows from which it gets the
bulk of its income. That income is huge so, why not
use that undisclosed income for all JEWELERS OF AMERICA
comprised of its membership from STATE AFFILIATES?
Instead JA now takes over the once independent Jewelry
Industry Council. Has JA's divorce from its Affiliates
been blessed by its membership? After all JA is (or
was) a membership association comprised of its members;
all of JEWELERS IN AMERICA and its Affiliates are the
JEWELERS OF AMERICA.
Joel Windman - 2009-22-6 08:57:00 EDT -
"JA redefines its role with State Affiliates". HOW? By
letting States to go there own way. Why? JA doesn't
get enough dollars from State Jewelers, its members in
return. JA holds trade shows from which it gets the
bulk of its income. That income is huge so, why not
use that undisclosed income for all JEWELERS OF AMERICA
comprised of its membership from STATE AFFILIATES?
Instead JA now takes over the once independent Jewelry
Industry Council. Has JA's divorce from its Affiliates
been blessed by its membership? After all JA is (or
was) a membership association comprised of its members;
all of JEWELERS IN AMERICA and its Affiliates are the
JEWELERS OF AMERICA.
Joel Windman - 2009-22-6 08:57:00 EDT



















